BETT 2012 – Assessment (and Reporting)

January 20, 2012

As a school we are struggling with clunky SIMS and various paper and Excel mark books. Theoretically we should use SIMS Assessment Module more because it is a centralised database that solves a number of excel problems (multiple users, new/leaving students, marking at home) but it’s so clunky and you loose most of the screen with all the menus.

A few years ago I heard that SIMS was to be forced to allow others to access the data contained within it, thereby opening the way for smaller agile companies to innovate and provide new solutions to provide important new functionality. So the search continued this year at BETT. It’s a great opportunity to get around a lot of solutions in a short time.

And this year – at last! – I found a stunning solution  - Go4schools – which also happened to win a BETT award (not necessarily a recommendation in my view based on previous evidence). Classroom Monitor I also found interesting and will investigate further for the English and maybe (my) ICT dept.

Go4Schools.com

Allows heads of department to set  the departmental tracking points for each term and to check they have been completed – with work flow that reminds teachers. There is nice granular permissions that allow people that need to see the data. And then, the holy grail, all vital statistics are visible in a dashboard in real time (rather than just 4 times a year). Statistics include:

  • Performance against target (whole year, each class, each teacher, by vulnerable group, individual student). This makes the Ofsted requirement of tracking vulnerable groups trivial.
  • Nationwide Residuals (as above)
  • Tracking of interventions is based on live data. Allows year heads, tutors and subject teachers to ‘be on the same page.

Then the killer punch is that reports can be provided to parents digitally with work flow that manages a 2 stage reviewing process (by teaching colleague, then Head of Dept) and statement banks that improve quality and saves teachers time. Reporting cycles can be reduced from Weeks to days.

So not only can you get a world class assement module, it will pay for itself. You can more than offset the 4-£5000 cost (large secondary school) by saving £thousands on  admin and printing costs.

On a personal level I met with Paula Benchly,  a deputy at Neale Wade School, who’s husband John developed the initial solution for her when she was up to her eyeball in shared spreadsheets and trying to pull aggregated data from them. So it was nice to discuss the vision and development as she has been through what I have been struggling with the past few years.

Classroom monitor

If Go4school.com is about what to do with assessment (data). Classroom monitor is about better, more transparent assessment. APP grids or exam board leveling criteria are preloaded (but customisable) and there is a sophisticated interface that allows you to select a student (or group using a mouse) and mark their progress in relation to the criteria (Met, Almost, Not or Targeted – meaning awaiting evidence). Aggregated statistics are produced.

The cost would start at around £400 per department ( there may be customisation fees). So this could really help an English Department implement APP but I felt perhaps not a whole school solution.

I wonder if Classroom Monitor could be linked to Go4Schools so once the assessment is done (CM) the data flows into the school wide  system (G4S).


New School Inspiration

April 20, 2008

In this Internet age wonderful examples of education are just a click away. Try these two and believe.

1) New Design High School in NY

Rocketboom touching on the theme of education (again). The principle says “We are as concerned with their emotional and social development as much as their intellectual and academic”. Also check out a previous Rocketboom on the NDHS Eduvent Rooftop Legends.

2) Stovner Upper Secondary School in Norway

Ewan McIntosh describes how a failing school was turned round by asking the the kids how they wanted to learn. Sounds simple eh?


Lunchtime Teacher’s TV club

March 19, 2008

I just read this on the Teacher’s TV website.  Seems like a good idea, the only problem being that our lunch times simply aren’t long enough.

I run a lunchtime Teachers TV club. A group of staff gets together every Tuesday to watch and discuss a Teachers TV programme. Staff get a lot out of the programmes. I benefit too because I can use the meetings as evidence when I go for HLTA status.
— Rosemary Mappleback, Teaching Assistant, Woolton Hill Junior School, Hampshire

How to Solve Global Warming

March 17, 2008

litter

If we could teach kids to keep their schools free of litter we would solve global warming in a generation.

Global warming seems to be such an insolvable problem but getting a group of children to keep their school free of litter seems to be, albeit not easy, at least possible if we paid it enough attention.

But in fact a solution to litter in schools would need to involve all members of the community, it would need activists and belief, compassion and non aggression, making of rules and policing them sensitively, collaboration at a local, national and international level. All these characteristics are essential components of a solution to global warming.

Try solving the simple problems first. By empowering our communities to do something possible, we might just be able to tackle something that at the moment seems impossible.

image: creative commons licence – http://flickr.com/photos/mbrownstone/2043006071/


Asus EeePC : Test Drive

March 13, 2008

I got Asus EeePC to play with today from School. There is talk of giving them to Y7s, hopefully one each rather than shared machines. As Papert always said something magical happens when you go from shared machines (any ratio) to one-to-one (see herelisten here).

The machine is cute, and really handy to carry around. It seemed quite rugged but the space bar was already lifting off, and thats before the kids have touched it. However get messenger open and start surfing on wifi and I was hooked. I’m sure that the kids will love them, if not for the sheer portability, for the fact that it will be THEIR machine.

Power Struggle

Battery life is supposed to be 3 hours and I think that seems realistic based on one evenings use. Charging seemed to take a long time though. 2 Hours plugged in only took it up to 60%.

One little stated fact of Apple Macs laptops is that the power consumption is so good (cooler, quieter & better sleeping) compared to PC laptops. With no hard drive and a small screen the Asus unit does last longer than an average PC laptop but its Celeron Chip and fan is noiser and pumps out more hot air than the MacBook than I am used to.

So classrooms would need to have ample power sockets. And that will mean all classrooms that Y7 use and then next year all that Y7 and Y8 use, etc.

The screen is small but useable for surfing, the resolution is an odd size 800 x 480 and the lack of vertical height (the 480) could pose problems for some menus eg. on the GIMP (Photoshop replacement software), but who would want to edit photos on such a small screen anyway?

There is a VGA Monitor out, so a normal monitor could be plugged in. But I would rather give the child the extra power of a desktop machine too if the extra screen size were necessary for the task.

Not a Desktop Replacement

This brings us on to teaching ICT. I wouldn’t want to teach my lessons with children on this machine. This is because of performance and screen size. The processor is supossedly 900Mhz but is not being fully used according to wikipedia. The machine feels much slower than 900 Mhz machines that I have used with the same amount of RAM – 512 MB.

Thus there will be issues of Children doing work at home or in other classes on Linux or Open Office and needing to transfer between the schools windows machines, either by memory stick or via a portal – not insurmountable but will need to be thought through. That said, I am a believer in children learning different operating systems and programs, it teaches ICT capability and flexibility which are vital skills.

This model has just 2GB of flash memory, which sounds small, but even with Linux loaded leaves magnitudes more than the 15MB that the kids are allowed on the school network. 3 usb ports for memory sticks etc. is generous.

Get Creative

There is a built in mic and camera on some models (not this one unfortuneately). I think a camera would be highly recommended from the purpose of creating videos and the unit could be taken outside and used for filming quite easily if it’s not raining.

To summarize I love the idea of kids using machines like these for cross curricular ICT, but poor performance, battery life and screen size means that certain lessons will need desktop PCs.

Just carrying the machine around school and showing it to kids and staff showed there is a great deal of enthusiasm for the machine. And this seems to be reflected in the shops: they are selling like hot cakes.

However, it might be an idea to check out the original One-Laptop-Per-Child OLPC laptop that the ASUS is trying to emulate; and actually beat to market. Note the ASUS machine is much less ambitious in what it is trying to achieve.

Windows on Eee PC?

There will be Windows XP versions of this machine coming out, but I don’t like the idea of this for 2 reasons. One, why increase the price of the machine by 50% for XP and office when Linux and Open Office will do the job. Two, All the software they put on the Windows machines to lock them down will slow the Eee PC down to a crawl.


BBC News Day

March 13, 2008

Today is BBC News Day. Kids all over the country have been producing reports for TV radio and websites.  I hadn’t heard about this before and I’ve registered to be involved next year. Thanks to Deepak (pictured), our trainee from last term for letting me know. He has been involved with Patcham High in Brighton, his new placement school.


Er whats a library sir?

February 24, 2008

BritishLibraryPortico

In cooperation with humanities dept,Year 7′s are researching Native American Indians for their Desktop Publishing / Leaflet module. They have been allocated a famous/historical native american and were given 2 weeks to find some information from a BOOK and write it in their own words. They had to also cite the Author, title , publisher, year published. I told them about encylopedias and told them to go to the library and NOT use the internet. Internet research comes next.

Maybe I rushed the setting of the homework, Maybe I didn’t make sure that they wrote down the “In your own words” bit. But no one managed to do the home work properly.

Most just copy and pasted information from the internet. Some actually cited a book (probably because it was written on the internet page) but still copy and pasted text. The best (least Internet) was a photocopied a page of an encyclopedia with the source properly cited – and I’m sure he got help.

In fact all the adults that obviously helped the low ability kids got it wrong too. I can imagine the scene “There you go just look it up on the computer”.

I don’t know how much of a fuss to make about this. What with the native Americans, that I know nothing about, foisted on me and there being very little in the library to help, shall I just chalk it down to experience and move on?

Or should I stop everything to labour a point – just for all the kids and their teaching assistants and parents to go “Wha?”

Humanities should have some text books though. I could get the encylopedias down into my classroom. Kids have to learn how to look up things. I always have a race with yellow pages and yell.com to find a plumber and sometimes the internet guy wins even though I make them login in to the network and then the internet first.


Enquiring Minds: Let Children Decide

February 20, 2008

Children driving their own learning, investigating, doing, planning… This is on my radar

Check out the following link for a video introduction.


http://www.futurelab.org.uk/projects/enquiring_minds


Starting off on Dida

September 19, 2007

This is the second year that I’m teaching Dida Unit 1: Using ICT.

The first couple of classes I did an intro explaining key vocab such as AIDA, SPB, Eportfolio, copyright, creative commons and Flickr.com. The last 3 we didn’t do very well with last year and as I went to the Marking Dida training up in London where they told us they were going to be really strict, I thought we would get those concepts explained early.

The next difficult thing the students come up with is planning. They don’t like reading the SPB and they don’t like working out what to do themselves. So for Lesson 2 we looked deeper at the SPB and made them do a simple mind map using Open Mind software (another important skill). We set up a folder structure that would you believe it follows the main tasks on the Mindmap and SPB (structured thinking again ouch).

On lesson 3 we started putting more sub tasks in and boredom started setting in. Now according to the scheme of work I should be doing Active Book Chapter 2 Who What Why How (is that right?) but I find it quite abstract. Lots of discussion and talking points, not much for them to do.

Head of dept rightly said try to inspire them, its the beginning of the course. So I used the video of the NSPCC director (Ch 2 Digimodule) and talked about channels of communication, the C in ICT. We identified the channels, the audiences and what each of the audience wanted. Then did the classic Radio 4 vs. Radio 1 to identify how design changes to cater for different audiences (the low abilty group didn’t want to do it for Radio 4 tho.)

Much better.


Notes from Dida Assessment

April 3, 2007

Last week I went to a Dida Assessment course (GCSE equivalent qualification). We spend 2.5 hours going through a level 1 paper then 2.5 hours going through a level 2 paper, both of which got distinctions. I asked the moderator how long he expected marking a paper to take and he recommended 1 hour. Even if it takes half an hour I have 100 of these to mark which means 50 hours work extra work next term (minus the 5 hours of Y11 per week who will have left and who’s papers I will be marking.)

Other news from the moderator
The walk throughs are up on the Dida site and should be useful. We used them extensively in the training (no doubt they will break this link, try searching for ‘getting the standards right’ or gtsr).

Copyright will be treated even more strictly in 2007 than in 2006. Students must act as though they were working as professionals for the organisation in question (ie. a Make Space club or for Unit 3 the London2012 organising commitee). So that means forgetting that the project is actually a school project. I assume that as the Make Space club is a non profitable organisation (as is the Make Space organisation) you can get away with using Flickr.com’s creative commons database. However I have doubts that for London 2012 you can use photos with the non commercial licence, as London 2012 is actually a limited company.

Arcane? don’t you believe it. I think we should be teaching our kids these things. Only problem is that your average GSCE student doesn’t want to know, they have be copying, and watched everyone else copy, images from the internet with impunity for all of their school lives. Try tell them that they can’t.

Here are some notes I took Assessment Notes


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.